Home  ›  Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose the Use of the First or the Second Blood Systematic Review

Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose the Use of the First or the Second Blood Systematic Review

Written By Monday, April 18, 2022 Add Comment Edit

doi: ten.2337/dc10-1694. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose: the utilize of the start or the second drop of blood

Affiliations

  • PMID: 21289231
  • PMCID: PMC3041180
  • DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1694

Free PMC article

Self-monitoring of blood glucose: the use of the offset or the second drop of claret

Johanna Hortensius  et al. Diabetes Intendance. 2011 Mar .

Free PMC commodity

Abstract

Objective: In that location is no general agreement regarding the utilize of the offset or 2d driblet of blood for glucose monitoring. This report investigated whether capillary glucose concentrations, every bit measured in the first and 2d drops of claret, differed ≥ 10% compared with a command glucose concentration in different situations.

Research design and methods: Capillary glucose concentrations were measured in two sequent drops of blood in the following circumstances in 123 patients with diabetes: without washing easily, after exposing the easily to fruit, afterwards washing the fruit-exposed hands, and during application of different amounts of external pressure effectually the finger. The results were compared with control measurements.

Results: Not washing hands led to a departure in glucose concentration of ≥ 10% in the outset and in the 2d drops of claret in 11% and 4% of the participants, respectively. In fruit-exposed fingers, these differences were found in 88% and 11% of the participants, respectively. Different external pressures led to ≥ 10% differences in glucose concentrations in 5-13% of the participants.

Conclusions: We recommend washing the hands with soap and water, drying them, and using the first driblet of claret for self-monitoring of blood glucose. If washing hands is not possible, and they are not visibly soiled or exposed to a sugar-containing product, information technology is acceptable to employ the second drop of claret later on wiping away the first drop. External force per unit area may lead to unreliable readings.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

The deviation in glucose concentrations of the kickoff (A) and second (B) drops of blood when the patient had non washed the hands vs. control measurement. (A high-quality colour representation of this figure is available in the online upshot.)

Figure 2
Effigy 2

Modified Clarke mistake grids of fruit-exposed fingers and after washing fruit-exposed fingers.

Figure 3
Figure 3

The deviation in glucose concentrations of the starting time and 2d drops of blood vs. control measurement for different pressures. (A high-quality color representation of this figure is available in the online event.)

Like manufactures

  • Deciding betwixt using the first or second drop of blood for the cocky monitoring of blood glucose.

    Li M, Wang 10, Shan Z. Li M, et al. Prim Care Diabetes. 2014 December;8(four):365-ix. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Apr viii. Prim Intendance Diabetes. 2014. PMID: 24717246

  • [Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: express use for portable claret-glucose measuring devices].

    Houweling ST, Kleefstra North, van Ballegooie E, Miedema K, Rischen R, Heeg JE. Houweling ST, et al. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 26;149(13):694-vii. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005. PMID: 15819134 Review. Dutch.

  • Glucose monitoring after fruit peeling: pseudohyperglycemia when neglecting hand washing earlier fingertip blood sampling: launder your hands with tap water earlier you check blood glucose level.

    Hirose T, Mita T, Fujitani Y, Kawamori R, Watada H. Hirose T, et al. Diabetes Intendance. 2011 Mar;34(three):596-seven. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1705. Epub 2011 January 31. Diabetes Care. 2011. PMID: 21282342 Complimentary PMC article.

  • Self-monitoring of blood glucose: professional advice and daily practice of patients with diabetes.

    Hortensius J, van der Bijl JJ, Kleefstra Northward, Houweling ST, Bilo HJ. Hortensius J, et al. Diabetes Educ. 2012 January-Feb;38(i):101-7. doi: ten.1177/0145721711427787. Epub 2011 Dec 6. Diabetes Educ. 2012. PMID: 22146788

  • [Continuous monitoring of blood glucose by non-invasive methods].

    Heinemann L. Heinemann L. Journ Annu Diabetol Hotel Dieu. 2000:75-86. Journ Annu Diabetol Hotel Dieu. 2000. PMID: 10932870 Review. French. No abstract available.

Cited by 12 manufactures

  • Glucose biosensors in clinical do: principles, limits and perspectives of currently used devices.

    Pullano SA, Greco M, Bianco MG, Foti D, Brunetti A, Fiorillo AS. Pullano SA, et al. Theranostics. 2022 Jan i;12(2):493-511. doi: 10.7150/thno.64035. eCollection 2022. Theranostics. 2022. PMID: 34976197 Costless PMC article. Review.

  • System accurateness evaluation of 18 CE-marked electric current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015.

    Pleus S, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Mende J, Link G, Zschornack Due east, Haug C, Freckmann G. Pleus S, et al. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jan;8(1):e001067. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001067. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020. PMID: 31958308 Gratuitous PMC commodity.

  • Evaluation of the level of cortisol, capillary blood glucose, and blood pressure in response to anxiety of patients rehabilitated with complete dentures.

    Goiato MC, da Silva EVF, Cândido NB, Nóbrega As, de Medeiros RA, Sumida DH, Chiba FY, Dos Santos DM. Goiato MC, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2019 May three;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0763-z. BMC Oral Health. 2019. PMID: 31053131 Free PMC article.

  • Hand Hygiene Practices Amid Adults with Diabetes Living in Communities: The 2015 Korea Community Wellness Survey.

    Han MA. Han MA. Int J Environ Res Public Wellness. 2019 Apr 10;16(vii):1279. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071279. Int J Environ Res Public Wellness. 2019. PMID: 30974788 Complimentary PMC article.

  • Furnishings of hydroquinone-containing creams on capillary glycemia before and after serial hand washings in Africans.

    Choukem SP, Efie DT, Djiogue S, Kaze FF, Mboue-Djieka Y, Boudjeko T, Dongo Due east, Gautier JF, Kengne AP. Choukem SP, et al. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 28;13(viii):e0202271. doi: 10.1371/periodical.pone.0202271. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30153255 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Bergenstal R, Pearson J, Cembrowski GS, Bina D, Davidson J, List Southward. Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: proposed guidelines to improve accurateness. Diabetes Educ 2000;26:981–989 - PubMed
    1. Dutch Diabetes Federation. Recommendations for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Amersfoort, the Netherlands, 2003
    1. Dutch Association of Diabetic Care Professionals. Guidelines: Performing Cocky-Monitoring of Claret Glucose Utrecht, the Netherlands, 2004
    1. Dutch Diabetes Association. Self-monitoring of blood glucose [Cyberspace]. Amersfoort, holland. Available from http://world wide web.dvn.nl Accessed 1 May 2010
    1. The Netherlands Health Care Inspectorate. Recommendations for cocky-monitoring of claret glucose [Internet], 2008. Available from http://world wide web.igz.nl/zoeken/download.aspx?download=Circulaire_bloedsuikerme... Accessed 1 May 2010

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

  • Full Text Sources

    • Europe PubMed Central
    • Ovid Technologies, Inc.
    • PubMed Fundamental
    • Silverchair Information Systems

  • Other Literature Sources

    • Faculty Opinions

  • Medical

    • MedlinePlus Health Information

robersonshissing.blogspot.com

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21289231/

0 Response to "Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose the Use of the First or the Second Blood Systematic Review"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel